 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. See also Talk:CAVE (company)#Consensus on the correct spelling of Dodonpachi. Andrewa (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Mushihime-sama Futari → Mushihimesama Futari – On the CAVE talk page, it has been decided to remove the hyphens from all titles in order to avoid confusion and remain consistent with the official spelling of the games. --Relisted. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC) Jotamide (talk) 20:12, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Question - If there is already consensus for this, why does it need an RM? ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 17:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Probably to make sure it isn't a LOCALCONSENSUS... it's not a bad thing to discuss it. -- 70.24.244.161 (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- I don't recall seeing a consensus for this. Anyways, I submitted the request due to this being the spelling used by the developer for official purposes. Jotamide (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Probably to make sure it isn't a LOCALCONSENSUS... it's not a bad thing to discuss it. -- 70.24.244.161 (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Sources
edit(diff) What does assuming good faith have to do with there being a lack of sources? We assume good faith that editors mean well when they make contributions—it doesn't apply to blind belief that things exist when no one asserts proof. If you have reviews of this game, feel free to post them. Otherwise, it hasn't received sufficient coverage to warrant its own page and can be safely merged into Cave's article or a subsidiary. I imagine many other Cave games without reviews would also stand to merge. czar 14:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Lack of review from official channel does not equate to non notability? There were coverage on other aspect like gameplay, development, etc. I suggest letting the community decide whether to merge or keep the article. ♠♠ BanëJ ♠♠ (Talk) 18:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)