Talk:Music House Museum

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Music House Museum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 19:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Will be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020. MWright96 (talk) 19:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Background history

• "David Stiffler (an architect) and Dean Junker (a mechanical engineer)" - reword this portion of text without using parentheses

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• "started a hobby in the 1970s of collecting and restoring antique musical instruments." - began a hobby of collecting and restoring antique musical instruments in the 1970s.

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• "as a venture for the collecting, restoring and displaying of antique musical instruments." - how about collection, restoration and display

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• "In 1979, they decided to create a formal display to show off their hobby to friends and others." - for friends and others to see their collection.

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• "in the summer of 1983." - try not to use seasons per MOS:SEASON

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• "in the fall of 1983." - same issue as above

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• "It eventually opened in May 1984 to the general public" - to the general public in May 1984 might be better

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• "Work was then started in remodeling the 12,000 square-foot" - use the convert template on the text in bold

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• "The granary originally was where the farm’s workers lived and slept. They called the granary the old farmhouse, from which the music museum received its "house" name." - think these two sentences can be made into one and shortened accordingly

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Current museum

• Theatre organ doesn't need to begin with a capital letter

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:35, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• "that is thirty feet wide and eighteen feet high." - use the convert template in the words in bold

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:35, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

References

• Reference 2 is missing the access date

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

• Reference 5 (City-data.com) is a blacklisted source that should be replaced with another reliable source that cites the information it verifies

 Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address/query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 17:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

@MWright96: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

@Doug Coldwell: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Removing primary sources

I have just removed the references that are primary sources.Gusfriend (talk) 10:10, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)