Talk:Music of Red Dead Redemption
Latest comment: 8 years ago by ProtoDrake in topic GA Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Music of Red Dead Redemption article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Music of Red Dead Redemption" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
 | Music of Red Dead Redemption has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Music of Red Dead Redemption is part of the Red Dead Redemption series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Music of Red Dead Redemption/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 10:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
I'll take this review. If I'm not back in a few days, holler with all ya might! Sorry, couldn't resist. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Review
editGenerally a good article, just a couple of things in the references that need attending to.
- The YouTube references.... Well, WebCite may have worked in earlier times, but something's changed and now it doesn't work. So the references can't be archived. For the one about the cover in the "Legacy" section, this Facebook post by the group responsible can be used instead. This has been archived, and is usable. As to the one about the "Behind the Scenes" video, this link has a version of the movie which (I think) archived successfully. Here's hoping this will be enough.
- There are some inconsistencies present in the formatting of references: Ref 9 uses the magazine GamePro, but it is treated like a normal website when the other refs use a work/publisher format. GamePro was owned by International Data Group.
That's what I saw that's really holding this article back. I'm sure they can be addressed quickly. If there are any issues with this, please let me know so we can find a solution. Putting this on hold for now 
. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, ProtoDrake! I've gone through and fixed your concerns; not sure how that GamePro reference inconsistency slipped through, but thanks for picking up on it. Let me know if there's anything else. – Rhain1999 (talk to me) 14:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Rhain1999, I don't see anything more here. This is now GA
. Good work. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Rhain1999, I don't see anything more here. This is now GA