Talk:Musto (company)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I am contesting the speedy deletion as I have not finished completing the article and accidentally clicked save —Preceding unsigned comment added by Macca81625 (talk • contribs) 11:08, 16 June 2009
- Next time, use a sandbox. — 141.156.165.77 (talk) 11:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Notice: This article does not verifiably establish WP:CORP
editIn my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for Organizations and companies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:Macca81625 (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.
To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. Happy Editing! — 138.88.93.15 (talk · contribs) 21:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Prod
editThis page was proposed for deletion by 138.88.93.15 (talk · contribs) on 7 July 2009 with the comment: Article lacks sufficient Attribution for Verifiability of the WP:CORP notability criteria It was contested by Fences and windows (talk · contribs) on 2009-07-07 with the comment: Has some press coverage, tidied to remove promotional language |
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Musto (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.boatingbusiness.com/news/musto-granted-royal-warrant - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007185759/http://www.musto.com/fcp/content/zara_video/content to http://www.musto.com/fcp/content/zara_video/content
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100104114447/http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/businessnews/7544/281630.html to http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/businessnews/7544/281630.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)