Talk:Mutual Defense Pact of the Southeastern Provinces
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mutual Protection of Southeast China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160311030127/https://otik.uk.zcu.cz/bitstream/handle/11025/17656/Kocvar.pdf?sequence=1 to https://otik.uk.zcu.cz/bitstream/handle/11025/17656/Kocvar.pdf?sequence=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Han Nationalist bias?
editI’m concerned that stressing the apparent ethnic identity of the governors here is interpretive in a particularly proto-nationalist, Han-centric way. The whole Qing/Manchus-as-foreign-usurpers narrative is suspect to me. Would more knowledgeable folks kindly comment? Hoping for a variety of perspectives here in this discussion. Mimolulu (talk) 19:12, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
"Background" section
editThe "Background section consists of only one or two sentences, and has some POV issues. Can it be fixed or expanded, or is it even necessary? Firestar464 (talk) 10:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)