Talk:Mutually unbiased bases
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Will Orrick in topic Claims about priority for mutually unbiased bases
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
This article was created as a project for an Advanced Quantum Theory class. Edits, updates, fixed, etc are most certainly welcome. Mschirm (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Claims about priority for mutually unbiased bases
editThe article attributes the first introduction of Mutually unbiased bases to Schwinger in 1960. I am not sure this is correctly stated, in few of the fact that the discrete fourier basis (for the discrete fourier transform) is a mutually unbiased basis. 60.250.123.226 (talk) 05:59, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- The phrase used is, "The notion of mutually unbiased bases was first introduced by Schwinger in 1960," which, in my reading, is saying that he identified a set of desirable properties ("optimum degree of incompatibility") and made a definition ("complementary pair of operators"). (See page 575 of Schwinger's paper, especially footnote 3, for which you will have to turn to the end of the article.) Assuming he was the first to do so, I would say the phrasing is okay. It's not terribly surprising that sets of operators having those desirable properties would already have been known. The question is whether the properties and their significance were recognized earlier.
- If you can suggest a good authoritative source on the history that sheds light on this, perhaps we can have a look at that to determine whether the attribution needs to be altered. Will Orrick (talk) 12:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)