Talk:My Love (The-Dream song)

Untitled

This page should not have been redirected. This is a single, not any other song. This single will chart very soon only based on airplay. Mediabase is already reporting fairly airplay. -JuStar (talk) 21:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

If it charts, undo the redirect. It's easy enough, and nothing is lost. This song just doesn't meet the notability guidelines right now.—Kww(talk) 21:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Rhythmic Top 40 isn't a component chart. Don't remove it again from the table and don't delete any information about charts. It is considered vandalism. Thank you. LauraAndrade88 (talk) 20:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

This Lithuanian chart is reliable because it is based on votes, radio requests, etc. Croatia has a similar system. This is not a fake airplay chart. JuStar (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

This is a voting chart. It is allowed? It is important to know. JuStar (talk) 14:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Voting charts are typically not allowed. Whenever such charts are taken to AFD, they wind up deleted because of "questionable methodology". All the MYX charts are gone because of that, and that's part of what killed off the MTV and VH1 charts.—Kww(talk) 14:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

OK, but MTV and MYX charts are video charts. This is a national voting chart, where people can express their opinions and what they want to listen. Lithuania has no system of download charts. So this is what prevents them from having a official national chart? I don't think so. JuStar (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

You can always bring this up at WT:Record charts (or start an RFC if you want broader input), but yes, that would keep me from accepting it as a reliable chart. There's nothing that prevents Lithuanians from measuring downloads, and votes are too easy to fake. Also, you have shown no evidence that this is an "official" chart of any kind. Who maintains it? How do you know it is based on voting? What certification authority validates its sales?—Kww(talk) 14:21, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Next single.

{{editsemiprotected}} The name of Mariah Carey's single is yet TBA. Therefore, it is not 'Baby... Because I'm Happy' and this should be removed as soon as this page is not protected from being edited. 78.149.79.224 (talk) 02:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

By the time I looked at your request, that info had already been removed by this edit. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  02:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Mariah new single

you need to add mariah's new single on her chronology

Mariah new single

you need to add mariah's new single on her chronology "Obsessed" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Migrate1 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected

This article has been semi-protected until July 12, 2010 due to edits by Brexx (see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Brexx/Archive). IP editors can use {{editsemiprotected}} to request edits, or make a request at WP:RFPP to have the article unprotected. Admins processing the unprotect requests are cautioned to ensure that the unprotection request does not come from Brexx (who has a history of using it), and editors evaluating editsemiprotected requests are cautioned to ensure the request does not come from Brexx.—Kww(talk) 01:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on My Love (The-Dream song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924140939/http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/music_review.asp?ID=1671 to http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/music_review.asp?ID=1671

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)