Talk:Myositis
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Myositis.
|
Etymology
editWhat is the ? This needs to be included.Curb Chain (talk) 17:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
NEJM 2015
editDalakas MC
Review Article: Inflammatory Muscle Diseases
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1402225
N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1734-1747. April 30, 2015. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1402225
This review covers dermatomyositis, polymyositis, necrotizing autoimmune myositis, and inclusion-body myositis, including their extramuscular manifestations. Lots of molecular biology.
--Nbauman (talk) 01:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: MEDU 9330 - Expanded WikiProject Medicine
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 May 2022 and 29 June 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Medstudent10 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Medstudent10 (talk) 18:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Improper Tone - Use of 2nd Person
editThe extensive revisions by Medstudent10 introduce the use of 2nd person throughout ("your muscles" "your doctor") etc. Also, it's odd that statins suddenly got downplayed as a primary cause of myositis in the summer of 2022. One of many articles about muscle disorders and heart disorders and circulatory system disorders that have suddenly been changed after long periods of no change. The paper cited does not say myositis is rarely caused by statins, it says it's as common as over 10% in clinical setting. Wikipedia is such garbage now I won't even try to edit the page. Just pointing out the objective style violation, and the strange timing of the edit. BTercero (talk) 19:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
picture/ picture description text
editThat picture with THAT (current) text is totally worthless. Nothing is described, no part is pointed out, no part is named, nothing is explained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3033:609:8220:7971:72E6:AA8:B94F (talk) 06:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)