Talk:myria-

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spelling

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

About myria/myrio: the article currently [1] says "Based on a proposal by Thomas Young, some early 19th century publications used myrio- as a synonym", without context. However, this puristic spelling was mainly limited to English. It might be useful to add that Young was a dreaded opponent of the metric system in England, that he ridiculed the French neologisms, and that the metric system had no legal status in England at that time. The system was legalised in 1864 by the Metric Weights and Measures Act, which introduced a single legal spelling in English, myria. The expression "proposal by Thomas Young" somewhat suggests that Young invented the alternative spelling myrio. However, Prieur explained in 1795 [2] that the prefix myria derived from myrioi, but that after careful consideration the spelling myria was chosen. It is a neologism, not subject to puristic conventions. The French law of 1795 that introduced the metric system in France introduced a single legal spelling: myria. Ceinturion (talk) 17:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Brewster 1830 text?

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Matthiaspaul, yesterday you added a link to Brewster-1830 which does not show any text, in contrast to Brewster-1832. In wikipedia, a reference behind a statement has to support that statement. Did you actually read Brewster-1830 because it is in your library, or not? Ceinturion (talk) 10:09, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I did (not in my library, but in the scanned version). The reference, however, mixed up the volume. It is in volume 13 of the 1830 edition, and in volume 12 of the 1832 edition. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 14:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Myria-. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6GVoZ7mDw?url=http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/laws/metric-act-bill.html to http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/laws/metric-act-bill.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic