Talk:Mythology of Indonesia

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Use of the word Myth

edit

I am not sure, but I think that if I were a strongly believing traditionalist Indonesian, I would be particularly offended by the frequent usage of the word "myth" especially when it comes to beliefs that are still in existence. For example regarding the heading "Creation myth," I think it would be better and more inoffensive to rename the heading to "Beliefs about Creation" or something that does not evoke the feeling of arrogance towards people of different beliefs. A myth has, at least in my opinion, negative connotations, as it insinuates that the particular belief is in some way wrong - Just imagine you are a person of faith and someone calls your beliefs myths. Generally, the rule seems to be that a myth or a mythology is linked to a religion that no longer exists, for example Greek, Roman, Egyprian or Norse mythology. I can hardly imagine that anyone besides a hardcore atheist or internet troll would call Christian or Muslim beliefs myths, so if we refer to other existent religions or traditional beliefs as myths, it could appear as an act of prejudice or religious hatred that makes the article sound somewhat subjective. Please forgive me if I am wrong here, but I would just like to bring this to the attention of anyone who cares or anyone who could correct me in what I am saying. --Highschoolpuppettier (talk) 09:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mythology of Indonesia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply