 | Myxogastria has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 9, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that early mycologists classified species from the class Myxogastria (random species pictured) as "fungus animals"? | |||||||||
| This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article contains a translation of Myxogastria from de.wikipedia. |
| This article contains a translation of Myxogastria from de.wikipedia. |
Magic Myxies (1931)
editShould this page link to the ground breaking black-and-white film from Wardour Films Ltd. / British Instructional Film?
http://www.screenonline.org.uk/film/id/1269007/index.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.234.97.96 (talk) 10:57, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Monocellular?
editThe article states:
Although they are monocellular, they can reach immense widths and weights: in extreme cases they can be up to 1 metre across and weigh up to 20 kilograms (44 lb)
This seems to suggest that there are cells that weigh 20 kg and measure 1 metre in diameter. Is this true or does the introduction in fact need to be reworded? LookingGlass (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Agree. How big are the individuals? Are they distinguishable in the mass? 74.127.201.155 (talk) 09:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Myxogastria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121014001146/http://dna.gov.ar/CIENCIA/SANTAR04/CD/PDF/202BH.PDF to http://www.dna.gov.ar/CIENCIA/SANTAR04/CD/PDF/202BH.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Nomenclature
editIs there a reason for why the nomenclature of the Myxogastria (or should I say Myxomycetes), including many of its subtaxa, on Wikipedia does not follow the nomenclature apparently used in the literature and that used by Index Fungorum? 27.96.217.212 (talk) 10:37, 29 July 2018 (UTC)