Talk:N. (novella)

Merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was merge into N.. -- Λua∫Wise ^{(Operibus anteire)} 14:12, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Both articles should be merged. Λua∫Wise ^{(Operibus anteire)} 08:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Indeed. I'm not sure why two were made.Jmj713 (talk) 13:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I'm fine with the merge, but the article should focus primarily on the short story. So far this is all about the cartoon, but not the story it's based on. Granted there's not much that's known about it right now, so I'll redo the lead. Jmj713 (talk) 14:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Good work Jmj713! Bravo! Λuα ^{(Operibus anteire)} 08:28, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Requested move 7 April 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to N. (novella). EdJohnston (talk) 04:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

---

N. → N. (novella) – better 76.120.162.73 (talk) 20:22, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

• Support, better still N. (Stephen King novella). In ictu oculi (talk) 22:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
• Move to N. (Stephen King novella) per In ictu oculi. CookieMonster755 (talk) 00:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
• Support the current title should redirect to the disambiguation page for "N" N (disambiguation). "N." grammatically refers to all abbreviations that are just "N" -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 10:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
• Oppose per WP:CONCISE, WP:SMALLDETAILS, etc. Red Slash 14:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Common English grammar would disagree with you. "N." is any abbreviation that is reduced to the letter N ; therefore, it is not this novella. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
• Oppose per Red Slash. If a disambiguator is chosen, "(novella)" is sufficient. "(Stephen King novella)" is too much! Dohn joe (talk) 15:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
• Support per nom and per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
• Support. WP:SMALLDETAILS poster child right here. "N." could be an initial in someone's name. Steel1943 (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
• Support per N.. Would have no objection to N. (Stephen King novella) which is precise and natural and means the article should never have to move again. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:54, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on N. (novella). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090208175339/http://teaandscandal.co.uk:80/2008/07/26/stephen-kings-n/ to http://teaandscandal.co.uk/2008/07/26/stephen-kings-n/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)