Talk:NCIX
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Sister Companies
editThe sister companies section looks like link spam to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.102.52 (talk) 22:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- please start a new section next time. the sister companies is probably not spam, however, it does need sources, as does the rest of the article. most of the article appears to be legitimate information, and should not be hard to find sources for. on my to-do list. Aunva6 (talk) 00:26, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- It's been well-known for years that DirectCanada is basically NCIX under another name, owned by the same person. In any case this information is mostly of historical interest now, since with NCIX going under DirectCanada can't stay viable. --24.85.102.37 (talk) 06:51, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Youtube Section
editThe Youtube section seems trivial to me. It should be deleted. JitteryOwl (talk) 16:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- the channel has 200,000 subscribers and about 35 million views. it doesn't rate its own article, but it is a major, perhaps even critical part of ncix's marketing, and to exclude it would reduce the quality of the article significantly Aunva6 (talk) 00:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Supreme Court of Canada or Supreme Court of BC Bankruptcy?
editThe article states that NCIX filed for bankruptcy with the Supreme Court of Canada. However, their case information is recorded in BC's Court Services website.
If someone could provide a citation that it was the SCC, that would be helpful.
I did a search on the SCC website with the case number, and found no results. The Supreme Court of BC does appear to handle bankruptcy proceedings, however. Thus, I have changed the article. Biglulu (talk) 05:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Website back up...?
editTheir website's back up—is it possible they've resumed operations, at least on some scale? I'll hang up now and take my answer off the air. – AndyFielding (talk) 07:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Their Web site was still up for many months after the demise of the company but now their Web site is finally down. Brolin Empey 02:23, 26 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brolin Empey (talk • contribs)
NCIX Bankruptcy Auctions
edit22-Feb-2018
- https://www.ableauctions.ca/auction?aAuctionId=c79c4fb2-4d48-4c5c-bcc3-c02e37f9bccf
- http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/ncix-bankruptcy-auction-vancouver-february-2018
12-Apr-2018
Title
editI fail to see why the title is "Bankruptcy and data breach of NCIX" when this seems to be a general page about the company that just so happens to also talk about that specific subject. I'm therefore changing the name to just "NCIX (retailer)" Supertanno (talk) 18:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 30 March 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Rationale is that a) there is no HARD opposition to this and b) this has been multiply re-listed suggesting that no additional substantive input will emerge. I am sympathetic to the un-discussed move from the AfD-related title change, but that's what WP:BOLD is about, afterall; there was no discussion after the move on the talk page suggesting (but not guaranteeing) that there was little to no opposition. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
NCIX (retailer) → NCIX – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 207.81.187.41 (talk) 23:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. NW1223 <Howl at me•My hunts> 02:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 17:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment A 2019 AfD determined that the title should be Bankruptcy and data breach of NCIX; the article was later moved without discussion. @Supertanno: 162 etc. (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- I support the move since NCIX redirects here anyway. However, the move raises an awkward question. Ncix redirects to National Counterintelligence and Security Center. I don't know if there's a policy for managing different capitalizations in redirects, but I would suggest making Ncix also redirect here. I don't know what the NCSC is and how important the phrase NCIX is to it, though. SWinxy (talk) 02:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)