Talk:NOR logic

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Nathanscottdaniels in topic Using a NOR to make a NOR

[Untitled]

edit

Unless I'm very much mistaken the references in the tables headers to NAND in this article should be NOR. I suspect this is a cut and paste error from the NAND article.

It was based on the NAND logic article. I presumed they had all been caught out. Obviously, I was wrong. Will (message me!) 21:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Why does this article assume that it is popularly thought that computers are designed using only one type of gate? Is there any reason to believe that this is what most people think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.99.102.98 (talk) 23:10, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

In my experience this is indeed what a lot of people believe; however, I don't have any sources for this claim (which would be hard to verify). A rewording might be in order. Adrianwn (talk) 10:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

SVG

edit

This article could use the SVG graphics at User:Booyabazooka/SVG#Logic_gates WP 08:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is it possible to add link to my NOR logic equivalents page at http://www.mekanizmalar.com/nor_logic.html ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.164.160.38 (talk) 14:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hasse diagram

edit

The following diagram shows all binary logical connectives expressed only by NOR operations, represented by the black circles. I propose to include it at the end of the article, to show, how the functions themselves are interlaced - not only the logic gates in some computer.

When I included this file in the Logical NOR article, the reactions have been quite bad, and in a discussion we came to the conclusion, that it doesn't match there. As the diagram reflects quite exactly the content of this article, I think it matches here. If you agree, feel free to include it. Lipedia (talk) 16:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

 ABnot (A)not (B)contradictiontautologyXOR (A,B)XNOR (A,B)NOR (A,B)nonimplication (A,B)converse nonimplication (A,B)AND (A,B)NAND (A,B)converse implication (A,B)implication (A,B)OR (A,B)
All logical connectives expressed by interlaced NOR operations (represented by circles around the two arguments) (file) (zoom in)


3 input gates

edit

Maybe add some sort of section to show how to come up with 3 input gates? For example, a 3 input OR gate made up of 2 input NOR gates. There doesn't seem to be anywhere on Wikipedia that can explain how 3 (or even 4) input gates excluding small notes that they exist. — Eloc 06:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Using a NOR to make a NOR

edit

The section on turning a NOR gate into a NOR gate seems frivolous. Should it be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathanscottdaniels (talkcontribs) 22:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply