 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 06:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
NRO → NRO (disambiguation) — The US National Reconnaissance Office is by far the most common usage of the term NRO. Therefore, this should be moved, and the page NRO redirected to the National Reconnaissance Office article, linking back to here by means of the {{dablink}} template. —GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 12:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Survey
edit- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Oppose. After looking at the Google results, I'd say there is no primary use so the dab should remain where it is. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. As a TLA with potentially a large number of meanings it should remain as the primary disambig page. It also will be another incremental addition to geographical systemic bias if it were to be changed. -- Alan Liefting-talk- 21:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- For the record, I'm British, so CSB is irrelevant. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 22:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- CSB is relevant regardless of the nationality of the editor. Systemic bias is all these little bits accumulating. -- Alan Liefting-talk- 09:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Maybe we even need a policy or guideline for TLAs. There are only 263 of them, and they all should be disambigs IMO. Andrewa (talk) 09:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.