Talk:NSB Class 64/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Arsenikk in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 22:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    The article is reasonably well written. I made some copy-edits for gammar and clarity.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    I assume good faith for off-line sources, which appear reliable. No evidence of OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Sufficient detail and focus
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    One image used, licensed and captioned.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    This article sufficiently meets the criteria so I am happy to list it. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk (talk) 08:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply