Talk:NYC Pride March

Date

How is the date the march is to be held determined - something like "second Thursday in November", or a random date chose by the organizers? - 121.208.89.240 (talk) 07:17, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Most of the largest pride events have a set date like "the last Saturday in June", this is done for several reasons including coordinating regionally with other pride events so everyone knows the calendar well in advance. It also allows organizations and businesses to plan around the events. -- Banjeboi 14:09, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

The March is always the last Sunday of June because that is the anniversary of the Stonewall Riots of 1969. The Pridefest and Pier Dance are on the same day. The Rapture Dance is Saturday of the same weekend. Only the Rally is floating and has been one week or even two weekends prior. That is decided by availability. C. Williams (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on LGBT Pride March (New York City). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120207025912/http://www.queerty.com/the-gay-pride-issue-20070618/ to http://www.queerty.com/the-gay-pride-issue-20070618/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LGBT Pride March (New York City). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110712215328/http://homolexis.com/glossary/index.php/Pride_%28trope%29 to http://homolexis.com/glossary/index.php/Pride_%28trope%29
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.archive.org/web/20060214163344/www.bisquish.com/squishive/2005/07/27/in-memoriam-brenda-howard-2/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New York City LGBT Pride March. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nycpride.org/about.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060214163344/http://www.bisquish.com/squishive/2005/07/27/in-memoriam-brenda-howard-2/ to http://www.bisquish.com/squishive/2005/07/27/in-memoriam-brenda-howard-2/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

list of performers

Moving this list here, in case others want to source these claims for a separate article on "notable performers" at the annual Pride festival. — HipLibrarianship ^talk 20:38, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

• Ariana Grande
• Azealia Banks
• Bette Midler
• Beverly McClellan
• Candis Cayne
• Cher
• Cyndi Lauper
• Deborah Cooper
• Deborah Cox
• Demi Lovato
• Eva Simons
• Fergie
• Grace Jones
• Idina Menzel
• Janet Jackson
• Jennifer Holliday
• Jennifer Hudson
• Jennifer Lopez
• Kat Graham
• Kylie Minogue
• Lady Gaga
• Lil' Kim
• Liza Minnelli
• Loleatta Holloway
• Madonna
• Manila Luzon
• Natasha Bedingfield
• Offer Nissim
• Peter Rauhofer
• Robin S.
• Rosie O'Donnell
• RuPaul
• Sabrina Johnston
• Sophie Ellis-Bextor
• Sylvester
• The Weather Girls
• Whitney Houston
• Whoopi Goldberg

rally and vigil in July 1969

Heritage of Pride mentions 500 participants at an event—"Gay Power" demonstration and candlelight vigil—occurring "one month after" the riots; see this event page for example. Other sources seem to be recycling similar claims and language. I've included it in this article, but the July 1969 event could really benefit from better sourcing. — HipLibrarianship ^talk 04:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

An account of this demonstration and march (no candles mentioned, per se) was published as "Gay Power Hits Back" in The Village Voice; ref now incorporated into article. — HipLibrarianship ^talk 18:50, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

irrelevance of Sao Paulo parade size

@Gleeanon409: has repeatedly reintroduced content regarding the size of Sao Paulo pride events relative to NYC pride. As I noted in a recent edit summary, there's an independent article dedicated to the size of Pride events in the world, which is the most appropriate venue for such detailed comparisons. Raising this matter here to garner additional comment. — HipLibrarianship ^talk 04:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

I think you answered the question with your own statement, “the size of Sao Paulo pride ... relative to NYC pride”. When talking about NYC Pride being the largest or second-largest Pride event in the world, it’s perfectly logical to answer the obvious question, if possible, as to what is the largest in the world. After researching what sources say on the subject I summarized what I found.

Other than the possible exception in 2019, NYC Pride has been the second-largest only to São Paulo, Brazil’s event, Parada do Orgulho GLBT de São Paulo; South America’s largest, and consistently the largest in the world; which is listed by Guinness World Records as the world’s largest Pride parade starting in 2006 with 2.5 million people. They broke the Guinness record in 2009 with four million attendees. They have kept the title from 2006 to at least 2016. They had five million attend in 2017. As of June 2019, it has three to five million each year.

References

A good encyclopedic article should not shrink from reporting this. If new sources are found to counter anything here, they likely should be incorporated so the reader can decide for themselves. Gleeanon409 (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

RfC: On São Paulo content

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Consensus for including the comparison with Brazil in a brief footnote. Not in the body, the body can just say "largest in North America" or the current body that says "largest in the US" works. Brief footnote means 1 sentence, with 1 or 2 good sources, and a link to List of largest LGBT events or similar article that goes into more detail there, not here. Don't list years with Brazil figures, just write something like "usually" or "consistently", or "most years", and let the linked-to article or the sources go into those details.

Evaluating consensus here was more difficult than usual since there were 4 (and a half!) proposals, with most people only responding to some. I think there was some "version fatigue" involved. Fair warning, anyone who proposes Versions F or G may be defenestrated. Version C got 4 supports, which is half the total people participating, and there is an argument that those supports should carry to D, but version D didn't get any more than that, though some of the opposes only went down to "Mild", and even ColinM was almost ready to accept it. In the end, it looks like DonFBs comment "the comparison with Brazil should not be included anywhere in the main text, but could be mentioned in a footnote" is closest to consensus; most editors are against putting a long complex section about Sao Paulo anywhere, since this is the article about NYC, not Sao Paulo, but enough will grudgingly accept a short explanation in a footnote, with a link to the complex details. --GRuban (talk) 15:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

---

Is the following content comparing the top two biggest Pride parades appropriate for the “Size” section? RfC relisted by Cunard (talk) at 01:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC) because new options were added in the middle of the RfC. Gleeanon409 (talk) 14:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

[ * “Option A” and “Option B” have been discarded as too long; “Option C”’s footnote was too long so has also been dismissed; please see “Option D” further down. ]

Other than the possible exception in 2019, NYC Pride has been the second-largest Pride parade only to São Paulo, Brazil’s event, Parada do Orgulho GLBT de São Paulo; South America’s largest, and consistently the largest in the world; which is listed by Guinness World Records as the world’s largest Pride parade starting in 2006 with 2.5 million people. They broke the Guinness record in 2009 with four million attendees. They have kept the title from 2006 to at least 2016. They had five million attend in 2017. As of June 2019, they have three to five million each year.

References

Comments on Option A

• Include. A fundamental component in reporting any parade or march is the size of it. When talking about NYC Pride being the largest or second-largest Pride event in the world, it’s perfectly logical to answer the obvious question, if possible, as to what is the largest in the world. After researching what sources say on the subject I summarized what I found. Gleeanon409 (talk) 14:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
• Sao Paulo pride stats are simply irrelevant to the NYC article. The size of any parade/march varies from year to year; there is already an article dedicated to relative size of LGBT events, so there's no need to compare the size of the NYC and Sao Paolo events in the NYC article. — HipLibrarianship ^talk 00:54, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
  • I appreciate that we have that other article but as we are not bound by size constraints there is no reason similar content can’t be in more than one article. And the point remains this is relevant to this article. I think this entire article needs expanding, for instance a summary of each year’s parade theme, and parade grand marshals, with more content about “growing pains” like that they opted to change 2019’s route to avoid choke points. Gleeanon409 (talk) 01:11, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
• Include but edit. There are more succint ways of making the size comparison. Cynistrategus (talk) 09:40, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
  • The São Paulo content can be reworked putting some in footnotes to condense it. Thank you for the feedback. Gleeanon409 (talk) 09:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
• No. 1) Majorly WP:UNDUE weight on São Paulo pride (to the point of coming off as promotional). 2) The existing content at NYC_Pride_March#Size already gives a good indication of NYC Pride's size relative to other events. 3) AFAICT none of the sources above properly support the core claim that New York's is considered the second-largest pride parade. The closest I found was the Pride.com source which says Other major Pride parades [than Sau Paulo] aren’t too far behind, with New York at roughly 2 million participants, and San Francisco at roughly 1.7 million., which at least strongly suggests that NYC is the second-biggest, but doesn't explicitly say so. Colin M (talk) 21:48, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

@Colin M:, unless I’m missing something in the current size section, there is no comparison to the size of other Pride parades, either in the US, or worldwide. The São Paulo content can be reworked putting some in footnotes to condense it. I think it’s a POV problem to insinuate NYC is the largest when its plainly not. It’s unsurprising that no one else is definitively comparing the sizes competently. But São Paulo does have the Guinness records people on their behalf. I’ll look at creating a new option. Gleeanon409 (talk) 22:51, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Relevant quotes involving size relative to other pride parades:

• (From intro) it is one of the largest annual Pride marches in the world
• Although estimating crowd size is an imprecise science, the NYC March is consistently considered North America’s biggest Pride parade

Based on the above quotes, I don't think the article does insinuate that NYC Pride is the largest Pride parade in the world. Colin M (talk) 23:18, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

I see what what you mean, although those remain very small distinctions compared to the larger volume of content of it being so big in 2019. Gleeanon409 (talk) 23:28, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

• @Cynistrategus:, and @Colin M:, please see if “Option B” might be acceptable. Gleeanon409 (talk) 23:28, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose. Largely my perspective on this aligns with Colin M's above, except in that I don't think there's a problem mentioning that São Paulo is the most attended march of its type. But we need only the simplest of dependent clauses to impart that information. Like, literally "second only to São Paulo's annual Pride March.[source]" Note that the source in question must literally say São Paolo is the largest; we should not be WP:SYNTHing that knowledge together. But really, I think we only need a source or two to state as much. But in no event do we need to go on about the São Paulo's event, it's exact size or what authorities have authenticated in this or that year. As I say, a mere mention will suffice, provided the 1st rank is minimally sourced to at least one RS. Even option B below is significantly more information than we need, an inexplicably oriented towards that event, almost as if it were the topic of this article. Reference the São Paulo march as the most attended event in the simplest possible language, piping to the appropriate article, and cite the source. That's all that's needed. Snow ^{let's rap} 00:04, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
  • I’ve added “Option C” to try to address these concerns. Gleeanon409 (talk) 09:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Option B

Here is a one-sentence version with a footnote for those who want the numbers:

Other than possibly WorldPride NYC in 2019, the world’s largest Pride parade is São Paulo, Brazil’s event, Parada do Orgulho GLBT de São Paulo since 2006 as documented by Guinness World Records.

References

comments on Option B

• I definitely prefer this to A, but I still don't think it would be helpful to add to the article. The main reason is just that I don't think it provides much marginal benefit in terms of reader understanding - I think the existing text already does a fine job of conveying information about the parade's relative size. The other reason is that it's arguably engaging in WP:OR. None of the sources actually say NYC is the second-largest pride parade in the world. Colin M (talk) 23:40, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
  • @Colin M:, Thanks. I’ve seen that issue myself so maybe the changes I’ve made just now address that? Gleeanon409 (talk) 23:47, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
    • Yes, that lessens the WP:OR issue, but now it's a sentence about Sao Paulo pride, rather than NYC Pride, the topic of the article. It just feels out of place. Colin M (talk) 00:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
      • I think a sentence about NYC being the largest in US, and North America should precede. Gleeanon409 (talk) 00:59, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Option C

AlthoughNYC Pride is the largest LGBTQ event in North America; Parada do Orgulho GLBT de São Paulo in Brazil is the world’s largest since 2006, with the exception of 2019.

References

Comments on Option C

• Support: Sufficiently sourced and to the point. I think the footnote us probably superfluous, but its not a big issue insofar as the extraneous discussion of São Paulo's exact figures is at least kept out of the main body of the article. Snow ^{let's rap}
• Support Summoned by a bot. Short and sweet, easy to understand what is being compared and all info is sufficently sourced. Comatmebro (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

• Question How would you integrate the proposed sentence into the article's existing text? i.e. where would you put it, and would you need to also alter any of the surrounding text? Colin M (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
  • TBD, I’m guessing toward the end but I’m open to anywhere that makes sense. Gleeanon409 (talk) 23:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
    • The text already has a sentence mentioning that it's considered the biggest pride parade in North America, so I'm thinking it's not going to be as simple as just tacking on this new sentence (since that would introduce some redundancy). Colin M (talk) 04:28, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
      • I’m confident it can be reworked sufficiently. Gleeanon409 (talk) 16:57, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
        • I share that confidence: I think it's a simple matter of rolling whatever additional content exists in the proposed version into the present statement, and that doesn't seem a herculean task to me. Still, if you want to propose the exact wording, perhaps that would be the most pragmatic way to address Colin M's concerns and perhaps secure another !vote in support. I like what you've proposed for C, generally, so I for one have no problem leaving it in your hands to draft what it would look like placed in the context of the live article. Snow ^{let's rap} 20:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
          • I’ve modified: the article text to emphasize U.S. rather than North America; and Option C to add “with the exception of 2019” as a new source confirms São Paulo had 3 million opposed to NYC’s four. Now this option can be plunked as is right before the 2019 content. Gleeanon409 (talk) 01:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
• Support: I think you can drop the "although" starting off, however. Cynistrategus (talk) 05:24, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Done, good point. Gleeanon409 (talk) 06:17, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose: this option retains much of the WP:UNDUE concerns initially raised by @Colin M:, albeit now moved to a footnote. @Snow Rise: suggests that the footnote is "probably superfluous" but the footnote—complete with six references—constitutes the bulk of the content of Option C. I concur with Snow Rise insofar as exact Sao Paulo figures are indeed "extraneous" in this article. — HipLibrarianship ^talk 05:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Option D hopefully addresses this concern. Gleeanon409 (talk) 09:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Option D

NYC Pride is the largest LGBTQ event in North America; Parada do Orgulho GLBT de São Paulo in Brazil is the world’s largest since 2006, with the exception of 2019.

References

Comments on Option D

• Mild oppose I think this strays too far from the concern of informing the reader about the article's subject: the NYC Pride March. The article already has a link to List of largest LGBT events - if a reader wants to know about the sizes of other pride events, they can click that. If it were possible to include a very brief, verifiable comparison (e.g. "NYC Pride is the second-largest pride march in the world, after that of Sau Paulo."), I think that would be fine. But because the facts are more complicated, and the comparison requires a caveat ("with the exception of 2019") and an explanatory footnote, it turns into an awkward excrescence. Colin M (talk) 19:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
  • I’m open to suggestions on how to construct this better. We can only present the facts in so many ways. We do have sourcing that São Paulo was the largest from 2006-2018; and in 2019 they had 3 million, while NYC had 4 million. NYC pride is likely second only to São Paulo in size. Guinness or InterPride are the only entities likely to be tracking those numbers but I’ve not seen either publishing that, so we have to go on what’s available. Gleeanon409 (talk) 20:08, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose option D. @Gleeanon409: claims to be "open to suggestions" but continues to ignore the most repeated suggestion: This content does not belong in the NYC Pride March article, rather Its within the scope of List of largest LGBT events. — HipLibrarianship ^talk 03:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

• Please refrain from the bad faith assumptions; I’ve tried to address every thoughtful concern presented even if I sharply disagreed.
  There remains no reason similar content cannot be in multiple articles.
  If you have anything constructive to add that is certainly welcome. If you will never support the content sobeit. Thank you for offering feedback. Gleeanon409 (talk) 03:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

• I'm sorry @Gleeanon409: striking my unproductive comment now, and I regret any hurt feelings. I sincerely trust your contributions are offered in good faith. Indeed your addition of the Size section to this article paved the way for an overall improvement. Still, I maintain the São Paulo details are a definite digression here. — HipLibrarianship ^talk 01:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

• No problem, thank you for addressing this. Gleeanon409 (talk) 18:11, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

• Mild Oppose I'm okay with "NYC Pride is the largest LGBTQ event in North America" or even without the caveat "in North America", but it probably needs a WP:RS. Does USA Today count?Fred (talk) 01:29, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
  • It will be used with reliable sourcing. USA Today would count. Is there a reason you’re mildly opposed? Gleeanon409 (talk) 02:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
• Closing admin please note that support votes for the prior options, which are all longer variations, likely transfer to option D. If not I can start all over. Gleeanon409 (talk) 02:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Option E

(Summoned by bot)

I was going to offer this for further simplification:

NYC Pride is the largest LGBTQ event in North America; the pride march in Brazil is the world’s largest in most years. [with appropriate footnote(s)]

Upon further consideration, my opinion is that the comparison with Brazil should not be included anywhere in the main text, but could be mentioned in a footnote. The text in the 'Size' section as now written only discusses the NYC size and makes no attempt to compare it with others. The very first sentence of the article already links to the List of LGBT events. I agree with comments that the comparison is a distraction, irrelevant to this article and unnecessary, and frankly, seems only to be an effort to insert a promotion for the Brazil event. DonFB (talk) 06:10, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

The size section was designed to make comparisons to other events in the city as well as to other Pride events in North America, and worldwide. Since it’s the original Pride march it’s surprising that it’s the second largest to São Paulo. The size of the event ties into its notability; it’s impactful affecting large parts of the nation’s largest city. That’s the point of all Pride parades, to show that the LGBTQ communities are a significant part of society and can’t be ignored. Gleeanon409 (talk) 13:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

The kernel of your comment, and your apparent justification for wanting to mention the Brazil march, is: Since it’s the original Pride march it’s surprising that it’s the second largest to São Paulo. If we applied that standard to making comparisons, we might have examples like: "even though the Wright Brothers built the first airplane, theirs is not the biggest"...or..."Even though some scholars consider Damascus the oldest city in the world, it is not the largest...." and so on. I'm not sure precisely which term from formal logic covers these comparisons, but non sequitur seems to come close. One further response to your comment: the NY march needs no comparison to Sao Paulo or anywhere else to secure its Notability. DonFB (talk) 05:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.