Talk:NZR AB class

Trains: in New Zealand / Locomotives Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	2007-05-04

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Zealand Railways (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

This article lacks references.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Eight Wab tank locos were converted to Ab in the early 1950s, following the electrification of the Hutt Valley suburban services - this made the Wellington-based Wab class redundant but there was still increasing need for medium-sized tender locomotives. This brought the class total for Ab to 149. A further two North British-built examples were lost in the wreck of the 'Wiltshire' in 1922. Reference: 'Cavalcade of NZ Locomotives' AN Palmer & WW Stewart, Reed 1957

Table to be sorted, please

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I do not understand, why #732 and #762 are shown at the top end of the table. Could you change or explain, please. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 08:36, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Those two were lost in a shipwreck, and replacements were built for them with the same number. I'm personally in favour of keeping the table as it is. pcuser42 (talk) 09:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Locomotive naming

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It is a common fallacy that Ab 608 was 'named'. It was not. It was selected to carry the cast plates (not locomotive 'nameplates') commemorating the Battle of Passchendaele. To say the name 'Passchendaele' was accorded to the locomotive is incorrect. It would be good if the page could be amended to reflect this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Throttleer (talk • contribs) 12:55, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

There are plenty of references to the locomotive being named Passchendaele. If there's a reference that contradicts the referenced book then that should be added. --LJ Holden 04:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic