Talk:NZR J class (1939)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the NZR JB class page were merged into NZR J class (1939) on 16 January 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Image copyright problem with Image:OP-13841.jpg
edit
The image Image:OP-13841.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
#c-FairuseBot-2008-09-23T08:27:00.000Z-Image_copyright_problem_with_Image:OP-13841.jpg){kind=link}
No operational information in article
editDoes anyone have any operational history for this class of locomotive? When did they go into service, what kind of traffic they were used for, when they were retired, etc. There's very little actual information here, apart from basic data. Resinguy (talk) 03:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- True, this article needs expanding... however like everything on Wikipedia the best way to grow an article is to research the topic and edit it yourself :-) --LJ Holden 03:18, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editThe article on the Jb class should be merged into this one as there is no fundamental difference between them. The Jb were created from J class locomotives by converting them burn oil instead of coal. It seems unnecessary to have two articles for them.Stallion09 (talk) 20:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Done