Talk:Nader Mahdavi
Latest comment: 6 years ago by 176.126.245.154 in topic Citations needed
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nader Mahdavi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citations needed
editIn addition to the NPOV, citation needed that is not a disputed point of view — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.126.245.154 (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
NPOV dispute Death
editThe article alleges that Mahdavi was tortured and executed by US forces. It cites two Iranian websites as the sources for the claim. These are clearly not objective sources suitable as the basis for a neutral encyclopedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.28.137.56 (talk) 01:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Mass deletion again by FreeatlastChitchat
edit@FreeatlastChitchat: I think that you start your wrong work again and delete many part of the article without any summary or discussion in talk page. I said to you first say your reasons in the talk page and after conclusion we can edit the article. You delete part of the text that there are many references about them. If repeat your work, I report you.Saff V. (talk) 08:52, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Saff V. Why should I take permission for changes which are in accordance with MOS? And why the hell are you threatening me with reports? You want to report me for simple changes? go ahead, report me. Lets see what uninvolved admins have to say about this behavior of yours. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 10:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @FreeatlastChitchat: You can not delete sourced text without valid reason. MOS is about manual of style and not about deletion sourced text. Say your MOS suggestion before edit.Saff V. (talk) 10:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Saff V. Yes you are quite right, sourced text should not be deleted, so please show me WHICH SOURCED TEXT HAVE I DELETED. LETS SEE IF THERE IS ANY SOURCED TEXT THAT I DELETED. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 10:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @FreeatlastChitchat:You deleted the valid titles that are part of the sourced text. Why you deleted these titles? See Ahmad Keshvari article.Saff V. (talk) 10:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Saff V. titles are usually not used allowed in this sections as per MOS.If there is a whole lot of cultural influence we may break them down in film/books/ etc but even then individual titles are never used FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 11:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @FreeatlastChitchat:Yes, It is right. So, I edit the titles based on your comment.Saff V. (talk) 11:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Saff V. titles are usually not used allowed in this sections as per MOS.If there is a whole lot of cultural influence we may break them down in film/books/ etc but even then individual titles are never used FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 11:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @FreeatlastChitchat:You deleted the valid titles that are part of the sourced text. Why you deleted these titles? See Ahmad Keshvari article.Saff V. (talk) 10:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Saff V. Yes you are quite right, sourced text should not be deleted, so please show me WHICH SOURCED TEXT HAVE I DELETED. LETS SEE IF THERE IS ANY SOURCED TEXT THAT I DELETED. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 10:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- @FreeatlastChitchat: You can not delete sourced text without valid reason. MOS is about manual of style and not about deletion sourced text. Say your MOS suggestion before edit.Saff V. (talk) 10:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC)