Talk:Nadezhda Tylik
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 May 2014. The result of the discussion was merge to Kursk submarine disaster. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Underlying lk (talk · contribs) in the past. It was contested by Xoloz (talk · contribs) |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Previous discussions without headers
editYou have got to be kidding me in respect to the section that raises the question of the motives of the persons who tried to sedate Nadezhda Tylik. This damagages Wikipedia's credibility. The suggestion that the attempt to inject her might have been spurred out of compassion sounds disingenous. It seems rather obvious that the intention was to silence her, not to care for the poor thing. This was probably draconian behavior. I cannot prove this and rather doubt that the opposite ("the compassion argument") could be verified. Even if those doing the injecting were to personally assert that they did so out of the purest of motives, it would not be wise of Wikipedia to reproduce such an assertion, at least not without a statement of skepticism regarding such utterances. In summary: to engage in speculation about motives is not fitting behavior for an encyclopaedic work. I suggest the section speculating as to whether the injectors were kind, nice, fuzzy, altruistic and compassionate persons or government goons be relegated to the trash can. --Sean Maleter (talk) 00:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
What happened to the video? It has been silenced just as the woman was. Seeing as that video is 100% of this woman's notability there should be a link to it somewhere on this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.155.132.43 (talk) 01:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Trouble archiving links on the article
editHello. I am finding myself repeatedly archiving links on this page. This usually happens when the archive doesn't recognize the archive to be good.
This could be because the link is either a redirect, or I am unknowingly archiving a dead link. Please check the following links to see if it's redirecting, or in anyway bad, and fix them, if possible.
- http://sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=14499
- http://books.google.com/books?id=OADs4vQy_W8C&pg=PA32&lpg=PA32
In any event this will be the only notification in regards to these links, and I will discontinue my attempts to archive these pages.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:12, 13 July 2015 (UTC)