Talk:Naftalan, Azerbaijan

50% Naphthalene???

...it contains about 50 percent naphthalene,...
Is that a credible claim? It would be nice to have a citation. Naphthalene is a solid, so any oil consisting of 50% Naphthalene would hardly be liquid, besides it is harmful and has a very unpleasant smell. That hardly sounds like something you would want to bath in... --Malbi 19:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

It already does have a citation to an article in The New York Times (the superscript "3" footnote at the end of the sentence). In that article, the original sentence I took it from is "Naftalan crude contains about 50 percent naphthalene, a hydrocarbon best known as the stuff of mothballs." --so as you noted, that would not smell very pleasant... but then again, neither does crude oil :-p Now weather the reporter got it correct, I don't know. I hope that helps. --Bobak 20:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Just to add: frankly, the whole idea of bathing in oil is very incredible to me (but those pictures in the references don't lie...) --that was the very reason I decided to build up this article around this unique petroleum spa industry. --Bobak 20:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

• Pure naphthalene does not smell too bad to me, I am familiar with old-type mothball smell. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Move?

• Naftalan, Azerbaijan → Naftalan — (Discuss) —No need for dab, since the other page listed in Naftalan, "Naftalan, Croatia", does not exist (and does not even have links to it). — Chanheigeorge (talk) 08:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
• I have created the page Naftalan, Croatia. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  • I would have to say that the place in Azerbaijan is clearly the primary use, though. 199.125.109.126 (talk) 14:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
  • The Croatian hospital clearly does exist, contrary to Chanheigeorge's assertion, but I agree that the city in Azerbaijan seems more prominent. It's reasonable to make it the primary topic. However, it's probably sufficient just to redirect Naftalan to Naftalan, Azerbaijan. — Gavia immer (talk) 14:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
    • As Anthony Appleyard said above, the hospital page was created after I made the move suggestion. Also, does the hospital pass the notability test? Even if it pass, the city is much more important than the hospital, so I still suggest a move. Chanheigeorge (talk) 06:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• I moved the page, per the request and it really does seem to be the primary topic. If someone knows a fancier disambiguation trick than I do, they can perhaps make the hatnote a little flashier. Please let me know if there are any questions. Cheers. -GTBacchus^(talk) 20:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

separate article for the oil?

I think the oil is separately notable from the town[1], and should have its own article. Also, the article Naphthalene does not mention "Naftalan". John Vandenberg ^(chat) 10:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

I did an English-language Google Books search and most referred to the oil/ointment, not the location. The assumption of primary topic, asserted 5 years ago by a handful of users, but not actually demonstrated, seems to be void. I changed the ambiguous term into a tagged redirect and adjusted the hatnote, preparing for a move of the oil content to its own article. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:10, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naftalan, Azerbaijan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130801063923/http://www.ville-laigle.fr/navigation/aigle_decouverte/villes_jumelles.htm to http://www.ville-laigle.fr/navigation/aigle_decouverte/villes_jumelles.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)