Talk:Nagpur/Archive 3

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Images at Commons

The Commons:Category:Nagpur as a good collection of images related to Nagpur. Please check it, contribute to it to make a better collection, and place a request on my talk page if you need some photograph from Nagpur that is not covered there. Happy to help.

Shivashree (talk) 09:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

No references found for cite-74. Need to remove the text

No references found for cite-74. Need to remove the text — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.111.249.151 (talk) 15:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Dead citations

Most citations on this page link to the Gazeeteer of Maharashtra state. Most of these links were taken down from the website in the past year. I request everyone to find alternate citations, link to cached copies of the same citations, or (sigh...) petition the Maharashtra government to restore the Gazeeteer archives. Rohini (talk) 12:21, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

We can try this out. We first need to list out the links that are dead. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Quite a few have been marked in the ref list as dead links. I am in the process of checking all the references. Rohini (talk) 10:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Brilliant! I'll check thru a few of them and see if I can find an alternative. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
I looked up the pages on Wayback machine and the Google web cache. Some of the pages have been cached there; some have not. Is it ok to link to pages on Wayback machine or the Google cache? Rohini (talk) 08:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Dhantoli

The current subject is not notable, and does not cite any current references Fauzantalk ✆ email ✉ 09:07, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Merge. Trinidade (talk) 10:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Agree Merge Dhantoli] here. LGA talkedits 09:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Merge "Dhantoli" with the page "List of Localities of Nagpur" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankur.chouragade (talkcontribs) 14:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Prophetic POV?

"Nagpur is a city with great capabilities to grow and prosper in the coming days."

While not intending to insult the city's business sector (I have not visited India), I question the use of a statement in Wikipedia which looks too much like POV. It sounds like an advertisement for investors. I would have only written this in an article if in the context of quoted statement with a citation. There have been throughout history and around the world cities that were hailed as having a prosperous future ahead only to economically collapse within a few years, making such claims woefully outdated.Cloptonson (talk) 19:41, 27 September 2014 (UTC)19:39, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Advertising-style Prose

The ambiance that prevails at Khernakala is so soothing and placid that it will beyond a shadow of a doubt captivate you in a state of trance. The luscious green surroundings which are simply spellbinding blend into the aura created by the healthy environment prevailing there, to give rise to an awesome combination.

The above sounds like words from a tourism advertisement for potential visitors and deserves some condensation to fit the context of a fact-based Wikipedia. Again, something I would only include if it was quoted text.Cloptonson (talk) 20:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

notable people

I have just sorted the Nagpur notable people section into alpha surname order. As there are so many of them it may be time to make them into a list?Coolabahapple (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Nagpur Public Attractions

On having a look at the above section, it appears quite unencyclopedic and is written like a tourist brochure, including words such as "has become the most loving place in the eyes of Nagpurians", "can even be attempted by people who do not take part in trekking on a regular basis", "world known for its beauitiful design and architect", " which is said to have existed for more than 275 years", "The charm of the..." amongst others. Also, most of the entries are unreferenced. The picture of a tank also does not apear that notable.
I propose a rewrite of the section, removing the peacock terms and placing the attractions in alphabetic order to allay allegations of undue prominence. If any editors can include appropriate references (from old or later travel guides, but not produced by the city or government tourist authorities?) and maybe a couple more pictures of the most notable attractions that would be appreciated.
Any coments/suggestions? Coolabahapple (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Nagpur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:09, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

text removed

I have just removed the following words from the Religion subsection of Population section  :

The Catholic minority is past-orally served by its Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Nagpur with St. Francis de Sales Cathedral in Nagpur.

as it gives undue prominence to what is a minority religious group in the city. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nagpur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)