Talk:Naihanchi

Merge with Tekki series

Naihanchi and Tekki kata series are almost identical - the only difference being their names (Okinawan vs Japanese). As such, these kata belong in the same article. The article should then mention why there are different names, and the minor variations in the kata between various styles. This would make a better article. As is written now, these kata series seem like totally separate entities. --Scott Alter 07:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

TaeKwonDo version

This form is called Cholgui in Taekwondo, can it's Korean name be listed between the Japanese/chinese ones? some video references:

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T887f39bNXo
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXKgfEXtnV4

It is very well known fact that TKD forms came from Shotokan Karate Katas. Soparamens (talk) 01:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Adding Korean material to the article

I noticed that the article focuses on the Japanese aspects of the form(s), but also seems to assume some knowledge of Japanese terminology. For instance, Shodan, Nidan and Sandan to represent the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd form taught. As the forms are also practiced, albeit somewhat differently, by Korean martial-artists, I think it would be an improvement to the article to use more English terminology and to provide references to its wider practice.

The entry in the Tang Soo Do books by Jae Chul Shin gives a very similar history of the forms, but with a few alternatives. It also begins by stating that, like many other forms, the exact creator is unknown, but tradition places the origin with Anko Itosu as learning them from the Chinese (original Chinese name of Naihanchin).

In Hwang Kee's book, he credits Chang Song Kye of Northern Song Dynasty China. I'm not sure of the origin of this "legend" as I am all the other legends concerning this form. I wasn't able to find a reference to Chang Song Kye on the internet from non-Korean sources, but perhaps the transliteration is off and possibly modified by the Korean. There is somewhat of a problem in that there are no independent sources that can verify the forms existence with precise dates before Gichin Funakoshi in 1922 introduced the Naihanchi Hyung to the Japanese as Tekki Kata. Although it was old at that time, the sources of its origin cannot be verified from historical documents. It only exists in oral tradition from before that point. Nearly all sources agree that it existed in Okinawa and possibly had a Chinese source. Jae Chul Shin describes this as developing in Okinawa in the 16th century and practiced in the Naha-te school and later at the Shuri-te school.

I would like to propose incorporating some reference to the Korean practice of the form and adding a little skepticism as to its origin with the "most likely" development in Okinawa perhaps in the 16th century and a "possible" Chinese origin. I have seen some Wu Shu forms that resemble Naihanchi (same stances and similar moves), but I wonder if this was a true origin or a coincidental reverse attribution. We might cite specific sources, but identify them as traditions held by various martial arts systems or masters and not documented facts. From what I understand, the Itosu origin and tradition is oral through martial-arts practitioners who trace the origin of their own style back to Itosu. The Korean authors note and accept the tradition, but don't treat it as fact, calling it a "legend" or "tradition." Gx872op (talk) 18:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naihanchi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924025437/http://www.hawaii.edu/asiaref/okinawa/digital_archives/pdfs/funakoshi-kyohon1935.pdf to http://www.hawaii.edu/asiaref/okinawa/digital_archives/pdfs/funakoshi-kyohon1935.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)