Talk:Najam Sethi

Untitled

Prior to 1991, Najam Sethi came across as a pleasant, progressive national self-determinist intellectual. Nowadays however, the man is the exact opposite: he keeps his "progressive" trappings, now in the form of unabashed comprador Pakistani elitism, and he uses his publications to to project the old Punjabi-establishment line which underlies the very essence of the fake Pakistani doctrine - clothed in these flashy elitist trappings. This is no consolation for true types of people.

Najam sathi , mujeebur rehaman shami AND ALI KURD saib you both are great human and muslim (practically).you did not take any side on the issue of judges on 13-02-10. and gave views on merite due to which issue has been resolved.please if any legal help do you need ,YOU SHOULD MAIL BE INSHALAH I WILL GIVE ON MERIT REPLY.AS PRESENT CONSTITUTION WITH LFO PRESIDENT WAS ONF RIGHT AND ALL LEGAL EXPERTS ARE TAKING HELP FROM PREVIOUS DECISION OF SUPREME COURT. THAT IS NOT JUSTIFIED BECAUSE CONSTITURION HAS SUPEME AUTHORITY AND COURT ORDERS HAVE LEGAL VALUE JUST ONLY AS LAW AND NOT EQUAL TO CONSTITUTION.BECAUSE SUPEREME COURT DECISIONS CAN BE INTERPRETED DIFFERENT IN DIFFERENT TIME ON SAME CASES. AND AT THIS TIME 99%LAW EXPERTS ARE AGAINST THE GOVT AND ALSO IF SOME ONE PAY FEES TO ANY LAW EXPERT THEN HE CAN TAKE ANY TYPE DECISION IN HIS FAVOUR.SAME LIKE SOME ONE IS PAYING TO THEM INDIRECTLY. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.120.233.3 (talk) 14:32, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

The article is an advert

I have an opinion that the tone of this article is like promoting and advertising Najam Sethi. I'd like to have this re written in an unbiased way. Will do it myself if I get time. Sarmadhassan (talk) 05:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://najamsethi.com/ns/about/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Dpmuk (talk) 05:03, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

What is the name of Najam Sethi's father?

Where can I find his familial background? (I was writing an essay about India-Pakistan rivalry in cricket, that is how I first stumbled upon this page. This is not main point of this comment though.) And I couldn't find the name of his father anywhere in the article? Why is that not included? People must surely know the name of his father. 45.120.16.154 (talk) 09:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Najam Sethi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140317003307/http://www.amnesty.org/es/library/asset/ASA33/015/1999/es/f42c6c5d-e12e-11dd-b6eb-9175286ccde2/asa330151999en.html to https://www.amnesty.org/es/library/asset/ASA33/015/1999/es/f42c6c5d-e12e-11dd-b6eb-9175286ccde2/asa330151999en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 11 February 2018 (UTC)