Talk:Naked Is the Best Disguise
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Khajidha in topic Frustratingly vague
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Naked Is the Best Disguise article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frustratingly vague
edit"speculating on alleged hidden meanings in the works of Arthur Conan Doyle.", "The book argues for a surprising relationship between the Sherlock Holmes stories and [many authors]" and "It alludes to Rosenberg's premise that Conan Doyle left clues throughout his works, revealing his innermost hidden thoughts." These statements are extremely vague and unhelpful. What exactly did the book say these hidden meanings were? --Khajidha (talk) 13:10, 5 April 2020 (UTC)