Talk:Naked Juice

Untitled

This article's history section sounds completely unprofessional. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.159.75.111 (talk) 05:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Recipe Changes?

The "Recipe Changes Spring 2008" section reeks of POV and original research. Unless someone wants to find some citations for the changes listed, I think I'm going to remove them. In any case, I'm going to remove the analysis bit, where somebody suggests that some of the changes "don't make sense." I'll do it in a week if no one protests.

- DevOhm ^Talk 04:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

I totally agree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.58.241.235 (talk) 20:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

-- I'm doing some other cleanup, so I'll remove them now. Aatrek (talk) 12:33, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 15:11, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Expansion and revision

Though this article has existed for a long while now, it seems to be lacking in several areas:

• lack of reliable sources - as indicated in the warning tag that has been at the top of the article since July 2008
• the article has no images at present
• notability is not properly established
• Plain and simple, this stub article is too short, and does not adequately present a comprehensive overview of its subject

In order to address these issues and bring this article closer in line with the featured article criteria, I've written and formatted a revised version in my userspace sandbox here. The primary changes include:

• created an appropriate structure of section headings -- in order to ensure readability
• following a fair amount of research on the topic, added consistent in-line citations throughout
• added two photos (took these myself and licensed them under CC-BY-SA 2.0) in order to provide a reasonable illustration
• added an infobox with basic info, including a properly-formatted logo to ensure accurate representation of the subject of this article

I feel that this is thoroughly researched, comprehensive and written in a neutral tone, but would like to put this out there for a second opinion before moving the draft to mainspace as PepsiCo (the parent company of Naked Juice) is a client of my present employer, which presents a potential WP:COI. Though I don't see this as having inhibited my draft composition in any way, I'd like to provide others with a chance for input prior to implementing these edits. So I'll leave this open to input for a short while. Of course, when these changes are implemented, it is my intention to remain cognizant and mindful of WP:OWN - meaning that I view these edits as progress; not permanence, and will always be up for feedback and thoughts from all viewpoints at any time in the future. Cheers, Jeff Bedford (talk) 00:18, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Just following up on the above - I've implemented these revisions as an orphaned image of the logo was asked to be placed into use. Moving forward, I am more than happy to welcome any feedback/suggestions at any point in the future. Note that I mean for this to come across in a reasonable and light, collaborative tone -- not in any way implying WP:OWN. Hope that the change between the old version and present version is evident as being helpful in building the encyclopedia. Regards, Jeff Bedford (talk) 18:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Recent Legal Trial

http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/07/18/naked-juice-settles-lawsuit - Should the "natural" descriptor in the intro be axed, or a new section added about this? natemup (talk) 05:27, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Recommended Page Revisions from Naked Juice

Paragraph 1, (sentences 1 and 2): We recently noticed that the initial copy appears slightly biased: “Naked Juice is an American brand, which claimed to produce "natural fruit juice drinks" produced by the Naked Juice Company of Monrovia, California;[1] operating as a wholly owned subsidiary of PepsiCo.” Can this be changed to a more neutral and straightforward company description? Here are two company descriptions: http://www.hoovers.com/company-information/cs/company-profile.Naked_Juice_Co.a18ba6d60a777e33.html - paragraph 1 http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=30718815 - under snapshot.

Additionally, we are wondering if you can remove the word “claimed” from the second sentence. The first of these drinks were produced in 1983 and sold in California under the name "Naked Juice", referring to their claimed composition of no artificial flavors, added sugar, or preservatives. Here is a company description: http://www.hoovers.com/company-information/cs/company-profile.Naked_Juice_Co.a18ba6d60a777e33.html - paragraph 1

Paragraph 7: We would like to request that the following sentence be added to the end of the seventh paragraph to explain the settlement. The paragraph isn’t incorrect but we feel it is incomplete and does not tell the full story. See: http://www.beveragedaily.com/Regulation-Safety/PepsiCo-brand-Naked-Juice-cuts-all-natural-claim-after-9m-US-payout - paragraph 1 “PepsiCo brand Naked Juice will stop using ‘all natural’ to describe its products due to lack of detailed regulatory guidance around the word ‘natural’, after agreeing to settle a class action for $9m.”

Paragraph 8, sentence 2: The statement “These juices are primarily GMO based” is not accurate and we request that it be removed. See http://www.beveragedaily.com/Regulation-Safety/PepsiCo-brand-Naked-Juice-cuts-all-natural-claim-after-9m-US-payout - paragraph 3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liam Naked Juice (talk • contribs) 20:59, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Dear Editor and Wikipedia community - I just wanted to follow up on my above request to see if you have had a chance to review my proposed changes. I would love to have these changes implemented before the end of the 2013 year. Thanks. Liam Naked Juice (talk) 22:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Dear Editor and Wikipedia community - just wanted to follow up on my above notes. Given that I haven't heard of any concerns from anyone I plan on updating the Naked Juice Wikipedia page with my recommended changes at the end of next week (week of December 9th). If you have any concerns with that please let me know. Thank you. 198.231.20.20 (talk) 00:15, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

As I have not heard from anyway I am moving forward with the recommendation changes. Thanks. 198.231.20.20 (talk) 22:08, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Naked Juice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110705005358/http://pollackarch.com/solutions/misc_naked_juice_izze.htm to http://www.pollackarch.com/solutions/misc_naked_juice_izze.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101113162142/http://www.packagingdigest.com/article/511489-Naked_Juice_begins_using_reNEWabottle_for_all_flavors_sizes.php to http://www.packagingdigest.com/article/511489-Naked_Juice_begins_using_reNEWabottle_for_all_flavors_sizes.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)