Talk:Naledi Pandor

Field of study?

Why the focus on personal stuff like religion? What did she study, where, doesn't she have a PhD? She was in exile for 20 years, if I understand correctly. Doesn't this need to be documented here? --WiseWoman (talk) 09:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC) Here's a link, just don't have time to write now [1]--WiseWoman (talk) 09:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Minister Naledi Pandor delivering speech, June 2015 (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Naledi Pandor/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 09:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Basic GA criteria

1. Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
2. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
3. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
4. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
5. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
6. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
7. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
8. Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
9. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
10. All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
11. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
12. No original research.
13. No copyright violations or plagiarism.
14. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
15. Neutral.
16. Stable.
17. Illustrated, if possible.
18. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.

For reviews, I use the above list of criteria as a benchmark and complete the variables as I go along. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments

1. during the period of 1973 and 1977 doesn't make sense. Does it mean from 1973 to 1977 or in 1973 and 1977 respectively?

2. to receive Diploma in Leadership (receive a Diploma).

3. from University of Stellenbosch (from the University).

4. University of Bophuthatswana is overlinked.

5. At that exact time. As it was a two-year period, remove "exact".

6. Several references to individual elections are written as "ccyy general elections" but there was only one of each so mention each one in singular.

7. Jacob Zuma is overlinked.

8. Link Minister of Home Affairs (South Africa) on first occurrence in narrative.

There are some grammatical and linkage points above which need to be addressed but otherwise this is looking okay and I should be able to pass it on completion. On hold for seven days. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

@No Great Shaker: Hello! I have implemented your suggestions. You can go take a look now. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 16:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Lefcentreright. Excellent. I'm happy to promote the article to GA. Well done. No Great Shaker (talk) 06:45, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

@No Great Shaker: Thank you so much! LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 11:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)