Talk:Nancy Drew: Midnight in Salem
Latest comment: 1 year ago by A MINOTAUR in topic Currently under construction
Currently under construction
editI created this article intending to work on it as a draft when I get some free time in a couple days - but I see now it is already (for some reason) a fully fledged article (which is also why there was some placeholder text initially). If anyone is quick on the gun and reading this before it's set up, do feel free to complete it yourself, though please note I plan to in a rather short time anyway, so don't feel like it's a critical task falling to you. Thank you! A MINOTAUR (talk) 03:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, just flagging that this article lacks reliable secondary sources that significantly cover the game and may be vulnerable to an AfD nomination as it does not seem to be notable. Please see WP:GNG for more information. The sources generally seen as reliable and independent are listed at WP:VG/S. Have you been able to find any sourcing for this game? I understand this can be a bit disappointing when work has been put into creating an article, but I haven't been able to find too much on this game. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- As per the post you're replying to, I had no intention to publish this page for several days, am unclear why it's a "full post" and not just a draft now (I never submitted it for review or similar), and have not in any way finished it - including adding applicable references. As that this is the 33rd~ entry in a line of games which all have their own entries I am reasonably confident that it can stand as an article. A MINOTAUR (talk) 12:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC) A MINOTAUR (talk) 12:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- No worries! I'm not sure how either, but that is alright. I am not gung-ho on these things, but I've run afoul of it every now and then. If an article lacks a few mainstream secondary review sources, it can sometimes be interpreted as having insufficient notability, which looks like the case for the previous few entries in the series. Apologies for jumping the gun, and hope you enjoy completing the article. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- No worries, appreciate you looking out. A MINOTAUR (talk) 13:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- No worries! I'm not sure how either, but that is alright. I am not gung-ho on these things, but I've run afoul of it every now and then. If an article lacks a few mainstream secondary review sources, it can sometimes be interpreted as having insufficient notability, which looks like the case for the previous few entries in the series. Apologies for jumping the gun, and hope you enjoy completing the article. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- As per the post you're replying to, I had no intention to publish this page for several days, am unclear why it's a "full post" and not just a draft now (I never submitted it for review or similar), and have not in any way finished it - including adding applicable references. As that this is the 33rd~ entry in a line of games which all have their own entries I am reasonably confident that it can stand as an article. A MINOTAUR (talk) 12:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC) A MINOTAUR (talk) 12:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)