Talk:Nancy Fraser

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Assistant-to-Nancy in topic New Updates Coming

Untitled

edit

The research section is vague and contains language unintelligible to people outside of critical theory. The second paragraph is heavily NPOV; it casts Fraser as ultra-reasonable without attributing that position to an external source. Instead, the article buttresses Fraser's credibility with a few sentences of accolades.

The article should be written so as to introduce Fraser's notable research, in a way that is legible to the uninitiated. I would do it if I could. Acone (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

New Updates Coming

edit

Hi all,

I am Nancy Fraser's current assistant, and she has tasked me with updating this page. I will be using sources directly from her. I will cite accordingly.

- Nancy's Assistant Assistant-to-Nancy (talk) 14:57, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply