Talk:Nandi Bushell/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Mujinga in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mujinga (talk · contribs) 15:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Overall

edit
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

I'll take this for review - I notice that the nom @DaydreamBelizer: hasn't been active for 47 days, so I might go slowly and hope to hear back before making a full review. Mujinga (talk) 15:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not seeing any grounds for a quickfail, article is stable and neutral. I'll wait to hear back from the nom before proceeding. Mujinga (talk) 16:02, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nominator still hasn't been online since 5 March, that's fine I can leave it another week or so (during which time my internet access will be intermittent), then if i haven't heard back by around 8 May, it will be a procedural fail. Mujinga (talk) 10:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Nominator hasn't edited since 5 March, so procedural fail it is, feel free to drop me a line if you want to review later on. Mujinga (talk) 09:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio check

edit
  • Happy to say earwig is just flagging up direct quotes so that's ok

Spotchecks

edit
  • on this version
  • 1 - I wasn't overjoyed to see youtube as the first citation, but it's being used fine EXCEPT it needs archiving so it can be verified to the given date. So right now, that needs updating and archiving
  • 3 - quote verified ok

Images

edit
  • Appropriate and properly licensed

Prose

edit
  • On a first read the prose seems ok, there's some sentences that could be pulled into paragraphs and the filmography needs referencing. More to come if the nom pops up.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.