| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources
edit- How YouTube Radicalized Brazil (NYT, 2019)
- Nando Moura acusa YouTube de retirar monetização de seus vídeos (Vice, 2019)
- Nando Moura, o metaleiro que ninguém conhecia, exceto milhões (Vice, 2016)
- Nando Moura publica vídeo em que Allan dos Santos e parceiros do Terça Livre dançam e debocham do coronavírus (Brasil247)
- Youtuber de extrema direita, Nando Moura se "despede" da rede social (Brasil257, 2019)
- Nando Moura se "despede" do YouTube em meio a críticas de censura na plataforma (Entretenimento, 2019)
Removal of content
editHi Dead o crítico. Thank you for your additions. I see that I was too quick in removing them--several additions may help improve this content.
Important issues on wikipedia are neutrality and the use of reliable sources. You removed some contents from the page out of concern for neutrality, but neutrality on wikipedia means something very specific (fully described at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). It does not mean that negative things cannot be in articles, or that negative labels cannot be used. Instead, it means that wikipedia must accurately reflect what is written in reliable sources. For this reason, it is improper to remove details about demonetization and the label of conspiracist. These come from a very reliable source, The New York Times, and the label is attributed.
One thing that I cannot fully evaluate is whether all the sources you use are reliable and significant. I will try to do so, but as I mostly only speak English, it will be difficult. For example, gossip magazines are usually not okay on wikipedia. I am not sure of what you included, so feel free to add or remove those sources based on this factor.
Please feel free to discuss your thoughts on the talk page if you have any question. Thanks again for helping improve the page. Jlevi (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Oh! Also, you may notice that I removed the picture you added. Unfortunately, the picture will soon be removed from wikimedia commons where you uploaded it. On wikipedia, we can only use free images, and it seems unlikely that Moura put his Facebook profile photo in the public domain. Jlevi (talk) 14:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)