This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I will assume this nomination is made in good faith, but you might suspect that the nominator has not read the whole article, because the nomination is completely without merit. While the first line deals with the word in its dictionary sense - the sense that is defined on Wiktionary - the rest of the article explains the term in its historic sense. That means an exploration of how the office fits into the wider context of the medieval household, supported by reliable, external sources. This is encyclopaedic knowledge, and in no way the stuff of dictionaries. I see no reason to act on this nomination, and will await a second opinion. I will therefore remove the template. Lampman (talk) 21:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
