Talk:Naples Metro
 | Line 9 (Naples Metro) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 26 August 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Naples Metro. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metropolitana di Napoli or Metronapoli
editThe name of the article is Metropolitana di Napoli. But the official site is called Metronapoli. And the official site only covers line 1 & 6 (and the funiculars). What about the other lines - is it a separate system? And why are they included in this article? -- Kildor (talk) 16:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
It is because the company that operates the majority of the network is called Metronapoli, but the network is officially called Metropolitana di Napoli. Most Neapolitans just refer to it as the Metro, however. I am upgrading the article currently, and will create a seperate one for Metronapoli, which will hopefully clear up any confusion. Robert Fleming (talk) 14:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Napoli second largest city?
editIn the artikel it says that Napoli is Italy's second largest city. But would Milan not be Italy's second largest city? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.102.154.9 (talk) 23:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
di Metro?
editDi Metro does not mean "the Metro." It means "of Metro." I am not disputing the nickname, but the translation is inaccurate.72.78.15.95 (talk) 21:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Ridership
editIf there are 470,000 riders per day, then there are far more than 29,000,000 per year. Roughly 171,000,000. --142.162.11.14 (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)8 November 2009
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Naples Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150511103205/http://www.anm.it/default.php?ids=3& to http://www.anm.it/default.php?ids=3&
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150620204749/http://www.anm.it/default.php?ids=1987& to http://www.anm.it/default.php?ids=1987&
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150620204749/http://www.anm.it/default.php?ids=1987& to http://www.anm.it/default.php?ids=1987&
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150406094756/http://www.anm.it/Upload/RES/PDF/ORARI/frequenze%20def.pdf to http://www.anm.it/Upload/RES/PDF/ORARI/frequenze%20def.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 25 May 2017 (UTC)