Talk:Napoleonic era

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / French / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

'Era' is capitalized or not?

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The terms 'Napoleonic era' and 'Napoleonic Era' both appear in this article. I suggest that only one variant of this term should be used to avoid confusion and to provide clarity. WinterSpw (talk) 01:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reformulation.

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Napoleon`s empire began to unravel in 1812, when he decided to invade Russia. Unfortunately, Napoleon didn`t think before making his move."

I believe the part "Napoleon didn`t think before making his move." has to be removed or made more specific. Ironically it is followed by "Underestimating the difficulties his army would have to face while visiting Russia. Convinced that the tsar was conspiring with his British enemies, Napoleon led an army of six-hundred thousand soldiers to Moscow." Which make the assumption that he did "think", as in he did have some sort of strategy.

The point is taken, but "didn`t think before making his move" is a non-formal way of speech. It can actually be seen as vulgar and even offending for some. As it may imply that every single action made by Narpoleon relative to the Russian-campaign was "bad" and not well thought through. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimi3s (talk • contribs) 14:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bonaparte's coup de etat?!

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Having just finished William Boyle's Oxford History of the French Revolution, I was surprised to read here in this article, in the introductory para, that a coup was involved. It wasn't mentioned in this well regarded telling. Boyle has it that Bony was installed as First Consul (of three) almost by acclamation. He had just made short work of winning all of France's continental wars for her. I would like to see a citation for this claim of a coup. wgoetsch (talk) 04:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic