Talk:Narayanhiti Palace

Untitled

It is not a museum. For the time being, Gyanendra and his family still live there. The CA decided that the palace should be transformed into a museum or be used in the national interest in some other way. To jump the gun the way recent edits have is equivalent to a situation where I say to you that I'm planning to take a vacation to either the mountains or the beach, and then you tell other people that I am already at the beach enjoying my vacation. Let me also note that, even if it does become a museum, it would not necessarily be given the name "Narayanhiti National Museum", as some editor decided it should be called. The Palace of Versailles is a museum now, but what do they call it? The Palace of Versailles. Everyking (talk) 04:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC) it is a big lie about this and that so please don't believe in wikipedia because it can be hacked as i've done with this page. SORRY EDITED. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.34.26.53 (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

copyright violation

A large chunk of the text of the article was stolen word for word from http://www.bharatonline.com/nepal/tourist-attractions/kathmandu/royal-palce.html. How come no-one spotted it??? The page it was taken from was the very first fotenote!!! 213.94.210.30 (talk) 19:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from this URL: http://www.bharatonline.com/nepal/tourist-attractions/kathmandu/royal-palce.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 02:04, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Conspiracy Theories

There is an extensive passage in the current article, written in a very casual non-encyclopedic tone, promoting a conspiracy theory about the murder of the Royal Family. I'm going to be bold and remove it. If everyone could watch the article to make sure it doesn't get added back in. There are no sources to support it, and probably never will be. I'm not saying there wasn't something fishy with the whole thing, it's just we can't put it in the encyclopedia until we have proof! Avgusztyn (talk) 22:09, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

spelling

someone mingled Salt Lake City with Narayanhiti, using -ity ending.