Talk:Nargaroth

Domain highjacked

The nargaroth.de has been highjacked. What's the policy in this case? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E0A:D5B:B160:116D:2844:3D8E:7CD6 (talk) 17:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Untitled

"German Hateful and Misanthropic Metal, made from White man for White man".

If there was a Rap band who had said "Full out Gangsta shit made by Black Man for Black men!" would put it under the page saying the artist was racist or is it only white people who can be racist? Wikiphreak 06:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

What a stupid question. Of course non-white people can be racist morons. The reason it was mentioned is the fact it caused some controversy (see interview with Diana Glöckner for example). I myself habe a question, too: Can anyone move that article from "Nargaroth (band)" to "Nargaroth"? 84.174.38.159 20:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I think it is you who are missing the point. If Kanwulf has made this statement, that would automatically make Nargaroth a racist band. The above poster was making the point that it seems ludicrous that there should be debate about this. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 23:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

There is no reason why "Nargaroth" should be a redirect to "Nargaroth (band)" (I can understand for Gorgoroth, but the Nargaroth redirect is totally useless). As I am no admin, I cannot move the article. Could anybody do that? Rotten Bastard 14:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Can anyone upload a new picture of Kanwulf? This one is totally awkward and gives a false impression of him and his character.

Fair use rationale for Image:Nargaroth Logo.png

Image:Nargaroth Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

citation needed=

This article has rediculous amount of [citation needed]-tags, shouldn't they be replaced wit a "This article needs additional citations for verification."-box or something? --UltimateDestroyerOfWorlds (talk) 18:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

History section written in a very partial/subjective way

The history section contains strange wordings that are not even trying to be objective and descriptive, such as:

"This decision was taken as a means to estrange himself from the BM scene, which for the most part never understood his work; thus his new "Ash" persona would work as an artist with very little or rather no regard for any scene. It got released by No Colours Records in 2007 in regular jewel case CD and a box-set limited to 99 hand-numbered copies that included the CD, the double LP version of the album which included several bonus tracks, a DVD titled "Burning Leaf", a T-shirt and other things and personal effect of Wagner himself of which he felt the urge of getting rid of (e.g., the wedding ring of his first marriage). " — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.104.117.184 (talk) 20:17, 25 June 2019 (UTC)