Talk:Narrative structure of The Lord of the Rings/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 16:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• I have done a minor copyedit; feel free to discuss any changes you might disagree with.

• Thank you.

• "balanced pair...threads of story" I think semicolons would be better than commas here. Also for the body.

• Done.

• "the "Nation's best-loved book." You should mention where the survey was conducted.

• Added.

• "and the two supported each other" would be better as "and that the two support each other"

• Done.

• "inevitability of loss...fade" this is confusing, it needs a colon somewhere in there

• Edited ("like" to "as").

• The images are all licensed and used correctly.

• Noted.

• The references are all reliable and formatted correctly.

• Noted.

• Spotchecks:
  • Seiler, Andy (16 December 2003). "'Rings' comes full circle". USA Today. Verifies all claims made.
  • Diver, Krysia (5 October 2004). "A lord for Germany". The Sydney Morning Herald. Verifies all claims made.
  • Nepveu, Kate (16 December 2008). "LotR re-read: Fellowship I.2, 'The Shadow of the Past'". Tor.com. Verifies all claims made.
  • Drout, Michael D. C. (2004). "Tolkien's Prose Style and its Literary and Rhetorical Effects". Tolkien Studies. Verifies all claims made.

• Noted.

• That's all I have. AryKun (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

• All done to date. Many thanks for the review! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:34, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

• Okay, will be passing. AryKun (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)