Talk:Narus Inc.

Sources

• http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/8/14724/28476
• http://biz.yahoo.com/ic/60/60701.html

Comments

(someone) wrote on the article page: Most of this text was taken from some news web page, which needs to be cited as a source and the page brought into line with Wikipedia standards. Note that also much of this text is a mixture of copyright article editorial, and fair usage of the company's own product information and publications

Explanation: Although the article was apparently originally created by "Frap", the current bulk of the article was uploaded by "Bewert" who happens to be the author of said "copyrighted editorial" from the DailyKOS article. (I know this because I asked him via email to add information to Wikipedia.) I did this because I initially found nothing about Narus, or by default, the Narus 6400 which his article for the DailyKos referred to.

So resolving the copyright issues of the DailyKOS source, (= user "Bewert" was also author of that article,) as the commenter more correctly stated, much of the material included in THAT article (and included here) does indeed seem to be of the company's own product information and publications and is therefore covered by fair usage, IMHO. dowser 02:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Okay, what's needed is definitive confirmation by or from the actual copyright-holder that the material that was on DailyKos etc is being released into the public domain, or else that the article is rewritten somewhat to not use quite so much "mass copying" from that source. if "Bewert" will post here that he wrote the DailyKos article and he releases its text into the public domain for Wikipedia use, that's fine. Otherwise we have to just rewrite it, it's not a big deal either way.

Second, it needs to be adapted for encyclopedia use, that means, neutral and informative representation of the company and product, rather than "news editorial style".

FT2 (Talk) 16:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

bewert here, yes I am the author of the original article (actually a Dkos diary linked at the bottom) and give full permission for this to be copied, talked about, forwarded, or whatever else you can think of to make this story more widely known. I just added an external link to actual docs from Mark Klein released by Wired. And thanks for cleaning it up to Wiki standards! I just threw my diary up, with very few changes, at the request of a DKos reader

Bewert 19:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

A recent editor removed the DKos blog link. I'd like to know why this is "non WP"? This is a top, (often #1), blog and arguably the "Narus" came into the public consciousness thru a newsworthy story produced for that blog. More to the point perhaps is that this article was CREATED because of that blog entry... with other references to Narus noticeably lacking on the WWW. Possibly this editor was not aware of this. I am reverting that link assuming the latter. dowser 02:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

updating content re Cohen

The page says "Whilst Hoover's company factsheet on Narus continues to list Dr. Cohen as Chairman, Narus's own website listing of the Board of Directors no longer mentions Dr. Cohen.". Checking the linked Hoover's page reveals that it does not list Dr. Cohen at all as of today (May 17, 2007). I'm reducing that paragraph to a statement that Dr. Cohen is no longer the chairman. --Kaplanmyrth 23:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Supercomputer?

Is it really a supercomputer? That seems like a stretch. It's a very nice DPI box and all, but not really a supercomputer IMO Ryan (talk) 05:27, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

What are People's Opinions on this

What are people's opinion's on this AVKent882 (talk) 03:12, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I would want to know who created their supercomputer claims..... 143.232.210.150 (talk) 17:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Surveillance

info on this has been removed. Here are more sources discussing it. Biosketch, would you like to incorporate it?

• Lawmaker Calls for Limits on Exporting Net-Spying Tools
• AT&T Whistle-Blower's Evidence
• One U.S. Corporation's Role in Egypt's Brutal Crackdown
• Firms Aided Libyan Spies: First Look Inside Security Unit Shows How Citizens Were Tracked

Tiamut^talk 16:17, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I'm the one who removed the bogus info. Pretty soon I'll get back to the article, I reckon, though there are more pressing exigencies higher up my list of priorities right now.—Biosketch (talk) 12:51, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Narus (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110902133951/http://www.boeing.com:80/defense-space/narus/index.html to http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/narus/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Company has been shut down

Apparently Boeing has simply absorbed it. The website is gone, and even the name Narus doesn't exist within the Boeing website except for old mentions in press releases. I don't know enough about Wikipedia rules to know what to do about this page. Does it have some historical value? PapayaSF (talk) 07:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

I agree. Can we highlight that was the URL? - Dean Turbo (talk) 18:36, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Narus (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110501023943/http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9GQTHC00.htm to http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9GQTHC00.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://narus.com/press/2004/0929.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Narus (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://narus.com/products/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090501205615/http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS140435+10-Dec-2007+BW20071210?sp=true to https://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS140435+10-Dec-2007+BW20071210?sp=true

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)