Talk:Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 4

Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 4 was nominated as a Video games good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 9, 2020). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Takara Tomy

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What you are deletion this Takara Tomy in the engine Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 4 but what of Naruto Sorm series has the game's engine called Takara Tomy. 200.153.166.112 (talk) 23:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Naruto Shippuden Ultimate Ninja Storm 4 - Let's Play.webm

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:54, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Removal of the Copy Edit Tag

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is not usually how it's done, but whatever. Miniapolis 23:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 4/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Reggie's Wrath (talk · contribs) 05:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Criteria

Good Article Status - Review Criteria

Further information: WP:WIAGA

A good article is—

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.^[1]

Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);^[2]

(c) it contains no original research; and

(d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;^[3] and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

^[4]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

^[5]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.^[6]

Review

Well-written:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The language used in the article will most likely stick out to the average reader	Fail
(b) (MoS)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Verifiable with no original research:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	A good amount of reliable references	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	^	Pass
(c) (original research)	No original research	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	No plagarism	Pass

Broad in its coverage:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (focused)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Notes	Result
The article is neutral	Pass

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Notes	Result
	Pass

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	all copyrighted images are low-res and/or comply with fair-use policies	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	'	Pass

Result

Result	Notes
Fail	It needs to change the general language and grammar used in the body of the article, several things stick out throughout the article.

Discussion

Naruto x Boruto ultimate ninja storm

Latest comment: 1 day ago1 comment1 person in discussion

naruto x Boruto ultimate ninja storm 4 2001:4454:25A:B600:3442:ECCA:8505:8B16 (talk) 07:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

Add topic

[1] Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.

[2] Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.

[3] This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.

[4] Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.

[5] Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.

[6] The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]