Talk:Narva offensive (15–28 February 1944)

In some passages in this an other Wikipedia-articles about the Narva-battle, you could start to think that only Estonians fought and achieved something in Narva. This is very wrong. Look at Siivertsi, it was not only Estonians who cleaned up the bridgehead the 6. and 7. of March. From the south end of the cemetery and further north than the granit monument, the trenches was cleaned by Norwegians and Volksdeutcshe. Look at Grenadierhöhe, you should think the Estonians retook whole the hill alone the 29. of July. While a Scandinavian soldier, sitting in front of everyone as Beobacther, saw everything, and tells another story in an upcoming book. And why does not anyone in the same way mention that the Seyffardt-regiment got destroyed not only because of mistakes by their leading officer, but also because Estonians did not wait for them, as they were ordered to? Remember that Wikipedia is a non-political place. And that Europeans from at least 9 countries fought in Narva. Jarao Jarao

You are welcome to propose sourced facts. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 10:04, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Tieke, Landwerh, etc.

Preserving here by providing these links: [1] and [2]. The edit removed Richard Landwehr (link speak for itself) and Tieke, whose Tragedy of the Faithful was published by the "notoriously pro-Wehrmacht", in the words of one historian, J.J. Fedorowicz Publishing. Carius was non RS in this context either. Please let me know if there are any concerns. --K.e.coffman (talk) 05:39, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Providing a link to an article that you largely wrote is underwhelming. Help us out. LargelyRecyclable (talk) 06:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

I responded on the editor's talk page: [3]. Since there's been no response, I restored my edit. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:36, 14 April 2018 (UTC)