Talk:Naseem Rana
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Naseem Rana article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
File:Naseem Rana.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Naseem Rana.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
POV
editHello,this article has a lot of unsubstantiated and unreliable material, that is neither verified nor supported with proper citations/references. General (r) Rana was certainly not as heroic as depicted/portrayed here, and it seems that this article has been written by the subject himself or someone close to him, primarily as a means of promoting this person. I really believe that some senior and competent and objective editor/s should take a hard look at this article and prune it drastically and realistically.Many thanks. 39.54.61.255 (talk) 04:56, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Col (r) Malik Mumtaz Khan , Pakistan
- I agree with the above editor. An interesting point I would like to add here, is that the article cites (supposedly) a book by Dr Ayesha Siddiqa a senior researcher at Quaid I Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan-- this book is supposed to be Military Inc. (published April 2007) which is something of a landmark in Pakistani academia. This book is about the corruption and self-interest in the Pakistan Army and how various senior military officers and, indeed, the whole army mechanism, have looted and continue to loot Pakistan's teetering economy. It has nothing to do with mentioning any military exploits of any generals etc. I wonder where she mentions Gen Rana's exploits as enunciated herein? Rather suspicious. Must check. Hamneto (talk) 05:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Hamneto
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Naseem Rana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110128015218/http://www.wikimir.com:80/naseem-rana to http://www.wikimir.com/naseem-rana
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)