Talk:Natal–Zululand border incident
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Natal–Zululand border incident appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 March 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the detention of two British surveyors for around an hour in 1878 formed part of the justification for the Anglo-Zulu War? Source: "The warriors splashed through the shallows and detained the men for an hour" from page 285 and "a rambling ultimatum ... a further fine of 100 head of cattle was to be paid for the offense committed agauinst Smith and Deighton" from page 287 and "the terms of his ultimatum, as he well knew, were completely unworkable .. he had committed Her Majesty's Government to an invasion of an independent country" from page 288 of: Morris, Donald R. (1965). The Washing of the Spears. Pen and Sword. ISBN 067-1-63108-X.
Created by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 12:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC).
New article that was moved to mainspace on 28 February 2022 is 4,411 characters and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected (AGF all refs re. any close paraphrasing issues, since none can go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 127 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. AGF book for ref 1 (verifying the hook) which is offline. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 07:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
