Talk:Nathaniel Mist
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Geogre in topic Biography assessment rating comment
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Biography assessment rating comment
editWikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
This article is very good. I think it should be put up for A-class review, if anybody is prepared to go to the trouble, since the A-class criteria fit it very well (much better than the B class criteria). The only departure from A class is that it's not "well illustrated"—as in, it's not illustrated at all. Let me see if I can find a portrait. Bishonen | talk 22:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC).
- I appreciate it. Illustrations stumped me when I wrote this, but I suspect there are caches of National Portrait Gallery images that float about without NPG copyright affixed. I have a feeling that Mist's Weekly Journal should have been scanned by somebody somewhere. After all, it's pretty important, and, if nothing else, the issue with The Persian Letter (by Philip Wharton, 1st Duke of Wharton before he lost his mind to brandy) should have been scanned by someone in a school of library science out there to illustrate press censorship. I'm a lousy image hunter, though. Geogre 01:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)