Talk:National Alliance of Russian Solidarists
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editCan anybody place the images in Commons to be used in other projects? Сергей Олегович (talk) 07:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on National Alliance of Russian Solidarists. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131225150156/http://www.novayagazeta.spb.ru/2010/77/6 to http://www.novayagazeta.spb.ru/2010/77/6
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
extenuation
editarticle is ridiculously biased and has poor use of sources. For example "NTS supporters believe the organization always defended democratic participation in government (even in the case of a monarch), championed individual liberties, supported individualism, and rejected chauvinism." This undocumented statement follows the only text part classifying them as fascists. and it is a documented citation, with an opinion. They where/ are fascistic and nazi collabos and this should be clear by this article and not just through the linked pages. Please set a marker that this page has to be improved.--Hybay (talk) 11:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)