Talk:National Archives of Trinidad and Tobago

	Trinidad and Tobago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trinidad and Tobago, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the country of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.Trinidad and TobagoWikipedia:WikiProject Trinidad and TobagoTemplate:WikiProject Trinidad and TobagoTrinidad and Tobago articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"References: Peters, Edwina. A Chronology of Archival Development in Trinidad and Tobago. Caribbean Archives 10 (1993): 23-32."

I'm worried that there may be copyvio issues here. Google didn't turn up anything. I don't have access to this book through my local library, so I can't proceed further on this. Kathy A. 01:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Expert review

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

There was no response. Will send the article to AfD. --B. Wolterding 13:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

As part of the Notability wikiproject, I am trying to sort out whether this topic is notable enough to have its own article. This orphaned article is actually based on one source, which I don't have access to, and Google turns up almost nothing (I found one hint that the archive exists, so the article is not a hoax). Could you have a look and tell me whether the article should be kept, or whether it should be removed as non-notable? Or maybe there's a good place to merge it?

Your opinions are welcome; please add your comments below. --B. Wolterding 15:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 August 2007. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Some reworking of the text is required near the end - use of the first person plural etc. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic