Talk:National Climate Assessment

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 October 2020 and 16 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dubais.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Flaws

This article was so flawed that I hardly know where to begin. To begin with, the National Assessment on Climate Change is NOT a report issued in 2002. It is a scientific assessment process that was mandated by Congress in 1990 and that produced a report in 2000, not 2002.

What happened in 2002 was that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued its own, separate report, titled "U.S. Climate Action Report 2002," which reached similar conclusions to the National Assessment. [1]

Confusing these two reports is akin to writing an article about the Mormon Church which claims that it was founded in Korea by Sun Myung Moon. A mistake this fundamental demonstrates that its author simply knows nothing at all about the topic on which he is writing. I find it rather mind-boggling, frankly, that Ed would call the NACC "fundamentally flawed," when clearly he has never read its report and doesn't even know what the NACC is.

I've also removed the section from this article in which Ed purports to list specific methodological flaws in the NACC report. None of the supporting citations that Ed offered to back up these methodological claims even mention the NACC.

--Sheldon Rampton 10:09, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved by Tess.carter. --BDD (talk) 21:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

National Assessment on Climate Change → National Climate Assessment – The National Assessment on Climate Change was the title of the 2004 report issued by the USGCRP. The ongoing assessment process as well as the two additional reports (2009,2014) are now called simply the National Climate Assessment. All the information in the current article titled National Assessment on Climate Change refer to what is now known as the National Climate Assessment. 76.161.26.115 (talk) 14:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 12:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
• Support Tess.carter (talk) 14:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

NCA 2014

NCA 2014 lead author is Gary Yohe

report released May 6, 2014

--jwalling (talk) 01:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Criticism

There is no longer any section on criticism as neither of the two existing para I removed had references and/or relevant content to justify presence. There could be a section discussing the lacuna of NCA from a third party robust, objective source, preferably, peer-reviewed. For now most of the references come from the USGCRP itself and while the research and reporting process was very inclusive, the wiki article would benefit from inclusion of other references.

--Oceanflynntalk oceanflynn 15:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on National Climate Assessment. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130218110850/http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/15C56A.txt to http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/15C56A.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

"Participating Federal Agencies" section removed?

Participating Federal Agencies: The following is a list of participating agencies:.

• Agency for International Development
• United States Department of Agriculture
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce and National Institute of Standards and Technology
• United States Department of Defense
• United States Department of Energy
• National Institutes of Health, United States Department of Health and Human Services
• United States Department of State
• United States Department of Transportation
• United States Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior
• United States Environmental Protection Agency
• National Aeronautics and Space Administration
• National Science Foundation
• Smithsonian Institution

References

@Prokaryotes: not sure why you removed the above section ... ? X1\ (talk) 19:35, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

WP style is against such listings? Where do we use this kind of lists? And how exactly is this beneficial to the article? NAS, NSF etc are already mentioned in the article, if there is related coverage we mention the agency ofc, but not with just a list, imho. prokaryotes (talk) 19:41, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Also notice, not sure if recent addition but the 4th chapter lists in-text agencies with acronyms, pretty much everything. prokaryotes (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• NCA4 Report-in-Brief.pdf

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:52, 12 December 2018 (UTC)