This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Jmertel23 has posted a request for revision deletion, specifically of revisions 926271367 to 927300907 (inclusive) and of 927853827 to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=927855968 927855968] (inclusive). This is largely content inserted by Nubenruben. The Earwig copyvio reports are here and [1]. The first shows a 13% likelihood of infringement, and the only text it shows as being copied are document titles. Under US copyright law, document titles and simialr short phrases are not subject to copyright protection. Moreover, even if these were not titles, phrases of less than ten words would almost durely constiture fair use. The second copyvios report shows no copying at all. I also did a manual inspection of the stated source web page, and i find no significant copying in any of these revisions. Accordingly, I am going to remove the revision deletion request template. I fyou think my determination is in error, please post here or on Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems, and please ping me. Thank you. DES(talk)DESiegel Contribs19:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
