Talk:National Convention/GA1
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Wizardman in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 00:32, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Why was aristocrats and antirepublicans absent?
- Majorities begin revolutions; minorities carry them on- whats this sentence doing?
- The rest part of the section has no citation
- from all classes of society - but there was the society of estates
- «The abolition of the royalty... How is it directly related to the text?
- There is no link of Girondin Convention in its section
- Jacobin club was an important part of the French Revolution and you have just written "name of a club."
- Again a similar statement by Robespiere comes
- Who were the Girondins is not clear
- Put reference in the short two line paragraphs in The Trial of the King
- The crisis and fall of the Gironde - Put reference in the necessary part
RRD13 (talk) 11:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- It's been two months nearly and nothing's been updated; as such this fails GA status. Wizardman 16:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)