Talk:National Counterintelligence and Security Center
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.svg)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Incomplete
editIn April 2016 editor Grandia01 tagged this article as inmcomplete. Since it is an office whose work is almost entirely classified, it is not strange that there is not a lot of information published about its work. However, in order for the article to be incomplete, it must be lacking with regard to published information. If you are aware of any published information about ONCIX that is not covered by the article, please list it so that other editor's may fill-out this article. Thanks. The only thing that I see missing is the release in 2011 of their report "Foreign Spies Stealing US Economic Secrets in Cyberspace". which did generate some news. --Bejnar (talk) 02:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Bejnar, is not the introduction long compared to the size of the article's main body though? Grandia01 (talk) 08:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, the introduction is long, but that is often the case with short article where there is not enough information to make sections. --Bejnar (talk) 01:45, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- understood. thanks for the clarification. Grandia01 (talk) 07:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, the introduction is long, but that is often the case with short article where there is not enough information to make sections. --Bejnar (talk) 01:45, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Ambiguity?
edit"While ONCIX does not distribute warnings of potential threats to the private sector..." could mean two things:
- ONCIX doesn't distribute warnings of threats that could affect the private sector; or
- ONCIX doesn't provide the private sector with threat warnings (of any kind).
From the context, I'm guessing it's the latter. Should this be clarified? – AndyFielding (talk) 07:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)